Google looks for relevancy and frequency. A multi-part series.
Part 1: Relevancy: Part 1:
It is both fortunate and unfortunate that AI researchers have not succeeded in their unholy quest to unleash a self-improving artificial intelligence. It is fortunate because Google cannot build robots which read as well has humans. It is unfortunate because a self-improving AI would almost certainly solve most of our worldly problems and usher us into an age of immortality. Now, these Google crawlers. They zip about in the World Wide Web, looking probably like bespectacled mechanical spiders surfing green rays of Matrix data lines, and they have a single mission. They "read" content and tell the G-Man what it is all about. But they couldn't put a coherent sentence together if their code depended on it, let alone appreciate the prose of such classics as Lolita or... Twilight.
They look for keywords, and basic structure, paragraphs and things like that. They are stupid, so they appreciate it if you include a picture or a video (especially a Youtube Video). If you put the word "Flash Gordon" in your blog post, Google will think your post is a nostalgic look at one of televisions most beloved 80's space-romps, and not a hastily-put-together article about what Rapid Content Wizard can do for you. Dumb robots.
No comments:
Post a Comment